A lot of clients come to me saying something like:
A lot of the success that occurs in counselling happens because the client decouples the external stimulus and the internal response. They begin to see the very same person or circumstance in a different way, a way that causes less stress, or even no stress at all. It's not that they are blind, tuned out or numb; they just don't compound the suffering the way they used to.
Sure, there are a lot of powerful stimuli out there: the loss of a loved one, being the target of bullying, violence, and all the big "isms" -- racism, sexism, ageism, ableism, etc. I do not underestimate the difficulty involved in maintaining a connection to one's dignity, goodness and self-worth when challenged in this way. But I am stubborn in my belief that such a connection is always within reach.
What happens between the external stimulus and the internal response is what determines the internal response. For me, bank statements can be provocative. They can "make" me anxious, depressed or angry. But what happened between stimulus and response? If I thought, "Oh no, maybe the mortgage payment will bounce, and I will lose the house," that is a thought that will lead to anxiety. If I thought, "Oh man, I am so bad at managing money; I have a very dark financial future," that thought will lead to depression. If I thought, "Darn! My wife is spending too much money!" that is a thought that will lead to anger. The anxiety, depression and anger are not therefore built into the bank statement. To prove this, let's send that bank statement to everyone on the planet. For half the people in the world, that thoroughly mediocre bank statement would be very good news, like winning the lottery. Some people wouldn't care much one way or the other. Some anti-materialists would send the money back to the bank or give it away. Some would look on the situation as a challenge: "How can I make this better next month?"
Now you might be thinking something like, "Bank statements are small potatoes; my problem is much, much bigger." Okay. Let's take a much, much bigger problem; let's say someone has a gun to my head. I'm not sure, but I think I would be scared. Did the person with the gun scare me? No. I scared myself with the thought, "I'm going to die" or "I may die at any moment." You see, not everyone would respond the way I did -- even with such a powerful stimulus. Some people would be working out how to kill, disarm, or get away from the person with the gun. Some suicidal people might be happy: "Someone will do the difficult task for me!" Some people would get indignant, "How dare you! Get that thing outta my face! Who do you think you are?"
So if I could only give one piece of counsel to all clients, it would be this: anytime you find yourself thinking or saying, "that makes me feel this," change the grammar. Think or say, "When I think about that, I make myself feel this." I make myself anxious. I depress myself. I make myself angry. Etc.
It sounds like you are taking the blame for your bad feeling, which should make you feel worse, but it doesn't work like that. You are taking the responsibility for your bad feeling, and therefore have more power to do something about it. When you get in the habit of saying "I make myself feel X," it will then be a very small step to get your mind around the reality that, "I could stop making myself feel X."
Sometimes we need support and guidance in that stopping, but really 80% of the counselling task is done once you acknowledge the power you have to make yourself feel stuff.